In a new interview former Vice President of Pfizer Michael Yeadon says that SARS-CoV-2, nor any other respiratory virus, exists, and that there is a depopulation agenda at play that is going to crescendo over the next seven to eight years.
In a new interview with Peter Mcilvenna of Hearts of Oak—“a populist Free Speech alliance that seeks to push back [on] cultural marxism”—Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Michael Yeadon shares some astounding claims that get at the heart of the COVID-19 “pandemic,” as well as the nature of disease itself. In the hour-long interview Yeadon drops several proverbial bombs, with the two biggest being his newly developed belief that respiratory viruses don’t exist, and his certainty that there is a depopulation agenda at work, which could crescendo over the next 7 or 8 years.
Throughout the interview Yeadon outlines a “grand plan” (so to speak) that’s being executed by who he presumes are “the richest people in the world.” Including “the movers and the shakers of the WEF [World Economic Forum] and all of their very large sponsors…like Pfizer… .” Yeadon also notes that “Big Everything” is likely involved, including “Big Banks, Big Tech, Big Pharma, the large industrial combines, [and] the investment management firms like Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street… .”
Yeadon breaks down the grand plan into four core phases, with the first being an “exaggerated health threat.” This, of course, being the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (or PHEIC, literally pronounced “fake”) declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) over the supposed introduction of the “novel” SARS-CoV-2 virus that ostensibly causes COVID-19.
The second phase, Yeadon says, was implemented “to impose so-called ‘measures,’ which you’ve come to know and hate or know and love. [Including] lockdowns, masks, social distancing, hand washing, border restrictions, school closures, [and] business closures… .” Yeadon—a drug discoverer with a PhD in both biochemistry and respiratory pharmacology—notes that these NPIs (or non-pharmaceutical interventions) “didn’t do anything” positive; something public health experts should’ve known by 2020, as the WHO had published a guide in 2019—which went to “every public health department in the world”—noting exactly that.
On the contrary, Yeadon claims—with an extraordinarily robust and ever-growing body of obvious scientific evidence—that all of said measures were quite harmful. Specifically, the former Pfizer VP says that the lockdowns were intended to “entrain us”—that is to condition people to accept authoritarian government rule—as well as “fatally collapse” most of the world’s economy. Yeadon brings up three key studies that have been performed in the U.S. over the past 70 years or so, informing elites as to how compliant humans are intrinsically. The three studies he notes are the Stanford Prison experiment (in the video below), the Asch conformity study, and the Stanley Milgram experiment (in the diagram above).
“I think all of [these] measures were put into place to test your… resolve,” Yeadon says. “And most of us, I’m afraid…are herd creatures. We are like sheep.”
Yeadon also notes this second phase allowed for governments around the world to print money using the “pandemic” as an excuse; consequently diluting the value of various currencies. Including, of course, the dollar—the world’s reserve currency. Yeadon even offers up an anecdote in which a currency trader “from Morgan Stanley or something like that” told him that the 2008 financial crisis “was deliberate and synthetic, [and] that the conditions were created to make that happen… .” When Yeadon asked the trader why, he responded: “How do you think people would’ve accepted the lockdowns if we weren’t used to the idea of open-ended financing?” (Recall that the Troubled Asset Relief Program—or TARP—allowed the U.S. federal government to issue $700 billion to purchase “troubled assets” owned by banks, etc.)
Following the massive printing of money in 2020, and the destruction of the world’s economy, Yeadon believes the ultra-wealthy political elites’ goal now is to come up with and put into “circulation” (so to speak) central bank digital currencies (or CBDCs). “There’s going to be a controlled demolition of the financial system and [those in power] will go ‘It wasn’t our fault, it was the pandemic. And we’ll have to rescue you with electronic money.'”
Consequently, Yeadon says, this—cashless—system means supranational powers, using something like Amazon Web Services, “will control everyone’s digital bank account on the planet.” Yeadon says “If [the powers that be] decide to restrict you, basically you’ll live your life by permissioning. So if you want to buy something in the future, you will have to present your digital ID and the system will decide whether you can make [that] transaction where you are now. And so, basically if they don’t want you to be able to buy petrol, you won’t be able to buy petrol.” Indeed, we already see this playing out in Sri Lanka. (See tweet immediately above.)
Before going on to the third part of the plan, Yeadon clarifies his relatively new position on respiratory viruses, noting that he “no longer know[s] what the causative agent was [for COVID-19 illness]” that people may have had. “And if I’m wrong about that,” Yeadon adds, “then the threat to the population [from COVID-19] was not different from…severe seasonal flu.”
The reason Yeadon says he’s “pretty confident” SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist—or if it does, that it only causes a disease no more lethal than a severe seasonal flu—is because of studies conducted by Professor Denis Rancourt in Canada. Yeadon notes that Rancourt, who worked as a physics professor and lead scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years, performed studies in which he analyzed all-cause mortality by week for Canada, and for the Canadian provinces, by age group and sex, from January 2010 through March 2021. As well as all-cause mortality in the U.S., state by state and county by county. Concluding from the totality of evidence that there was only excess mortality in the general population after COVID restrictions were put into place. And that excess mortality was tightly correlated with different states’ and provinces’ differing levels of overbearing responses.
Rancourt notes in one study that he and his colleagues found “that there [was] no extraordinary surge in yearly or seasonal mortality in Canada, which [could] be ascribed to a COVID-19 pandemic; and that several prominent features in the [all-cause mortality per-week figures] in the COVID-19 period [exhibited] anomalous province-to-province heterogeneity that is irreconcilable with the known behavior of epidemics of viral respiratory diseases (VRDs).” Rancourt and his co-authors ultimately concluded “that a pandemic did not occur.”
Yeadon claims that while people were dying in the hospitals during the COVID-19 “pandemic,” most of the deaths were iatrogenic—meaning it was the hospital protocols that were killing them; not a disease. Specifically, Yeadon notes that hospitals were mass testing patients—including asymptomatic patients—for SARS-CoV-2 (with misused PCR tests) and then administering (in the UK, at least) intravenous Midazolam, a sedative, and Morphine—all of which suppress respiration; obviously a counterproductive effect for anybody suffering from a respiratory disease. In America, Yeadon notes, doctors put people into forced comas and then put them on ventilators—again, a terrible idea for those suffering from a respiratory disease.
Although Yeadon doesn’t note it in the interview, a part of the COVID-19 treatment protocol in the U.S.—up until the very moment of this writing and into the foreseeable future—is the use of the highly deadly IV drug Remdesivir. Note that while the likes of Anthony Fauci, et al. tout Remdesivir as a life-saving medication, the WHO unequivocally states it should not be used to treat COVID-19. And while the organization has qualified its recommendation with claims that new evidence shows Remdesivir is actually useful, note the WHO still left up its original recommendation, and, more importantly, that there is robust evidence showing Remdesivir is dangerous.
The former Pfizer VP goes on to say that the third part of the grand plan was the introduction of the COVID-19 “vaccines,” and the fourth—now blooming—will be the introduction of rationing: “either for food or fuel or both.” At that point, Yeadon says, anybody who wants fuel or food “will have a mandatory digital ID and then the denouement is they’ll pretend there’s another virus and they will inject you with materials that I think will depopulate [humanity] over…the next seven or eight years.” Yeadon adds “If they do it quickly, you’ll spot it. [But] if they do it slowly, you won’t.”
Yeadon notes that a documentary presentation by German journalist Paul Schreyer outlines exactly how the world’s elites have been planning for the COVID-19 “pandemic” scenario since the late 1990s. Schreyer’s presentation (with subtitles) is embedded immediately above.
“So what we’ve just gone through with the testing and the lockdowns and the authoritarian rules—those exercises have been run since the late ’90s,” Yeadon says. He goes on to offer up the titles of the exercises, including Atlantic Storm, Lock Step, Dark Winter, etc. Yeadon says that “it’s the spook community [the CIA] in the states” that’s running the show along with the National Institutes of Health (or NIH, which is headed by Anthony Fauci), Johns-Hopkins University, and some of the nongovernmental bodies like the WHO and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Not only have those “pandemic exercises” lined up with real-world events that saw something similar play out relative to what was predicted, but the same has been true for the latest purported “monkeypox pandemic.” Indeed, in March of 2021 the Nuclear Threat Initiative—a nonprofit organization founded in 2001 by former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn and media entrepreneur Ted Turner—partnered with the Munich Security Conference to conduct a tabletop exercise on “reducing high-consequence biological threats” with a focus on monkeypox. Only months later the WHO declared monkeypox a PHEIC (again, literally pronounced “fake”) emergency.
Despite his not believing in the existence of SARS-CoV-2—or, it seems, any other kind of virus—Yeadon does still believe the viral spike protein is real. And is truly delivered (as an mRNA code) into the human body as pharmaceutical manufacturers like Pfizer and Moderna claim. He even notes it’s highly suspect that all of the pharmaceutical companies settled on the spike protein as their “vaccines'” antigen. “What are the chances… they would all pick the only thing that would make you ill?” Yeadon asks rhetorically.
Interestingly, while Yeadon has seemingly jettisoned his viral model of respiratory illness, he has retained the existence of the spike protein, as well as antibodies. Double PhD in immunology and virology Poornima Wagh, on the other hand, believes there is no mRNA encoding for the spike protein in the COVID-19 “vaccines.” And she’s supposedly collected data from 2,300 vials analyzed by experts.
With the belief in the existence of the spike protein in mind—as well as the mRNA encoding for it existing in the COVID-19 “vaccines”—Yeadon outlines how he believes the injections are maiming and killing people. And, needless to say, it’s entirely in line with how, say, Dr. Peter McCullough or Dr. Ryan Cole—who’s featured in the article embedded immediately below—would describe the mechanisms of action behind adverse events.
Regardless of the existence of the spike protein, Yeadon notes he has definitive evidence that different “lots” of COVID-19 “vaccine” have different levels of deadliness. He’s been able to figure out this anomaly—which he says cannot be random—by matching up lot numbers with VAERS (or Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) reports.
Putting a finer point on his thoughts regarding the COVID injections Yeadon says “The vaccines were badly designed, could never have worked, [and made for] a mad thing to unleash on the entire population ’cause we have no idea how they would work.”
“I do think the end game, unfortunately, is mandatory digital ID,” Yeadon reiterates. “I think the damage that has been done to supply chains, and especially food production and food supply chains… it’s there to make us believe there are food shortages and there may actually be food shortages.” Yeadon says he’s certain this is what’s going to happen, having thought about it thoroughly dozens of times. Indeed, Yeadon’s projection makes a lot of sense. And aligns quite well with what a far less credentialed, but equally wise person has been saying for quite some time.
Feature image: HeartsofOak
Related News
