TOP LINE
Former member of Australian parliament and general practitioner Dr. Kerryn Phelps has revealed in an official submission to her government that both she and her wife were seriously injured by the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Phelps, who is still very much pro mask and pro “safe” vaccine, says that serious adverse events being reported from the COVID injections is at least ten times higher than the official tally and that myo/pericarditis as a side effect is severe, not necessarily transient, and not limited to only young male recipients.
In a recent written submission to Australian parliament former MP and general practitioner Dr. Kerryn Phelps discussed her dreadful worries about so-called “Long COVID” as well as the lack of so-called public health measures like widespread masking. Interestingly, in a series of statements one would perhaps not expect from such a public figure associated with the government and establishment medicine, Phelps also described “severe” side effects her wife experienced after receiving her COVID injection. As well as “serious” side effects Phelps suffered herself, including “intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications” as well as “inappropriate sinus tachycardia [i.e. a faster-than-usual heart rhythm] and blood pressure fluctuations.”
“I stress at the outset that these people are NOT ANTIVAXXERS,” Phelps says in her submission to parliament regarding the citizens reporting harms from the experimental injections. (Emphasis Phelps’.) The doctor adds that “they clearly all presented for immunization as recommended or because their occupation required it, and would have continued to have doses of vaccine if they have [sic] not been so significantly affected by the vaccine they willingly had.” (Note that there is perhaps a contradiction between “occupation required it” and “willingly had” that Phelps does not understand.)
Phelps, who bills herself as “one of Australia’s best-known doctors, health communicators, and public health and civil rights advocates” as well the first woman and first LGBT person to be elected president of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), goes on to say that she has witnessed “first-hand with [her] wife” the adverse effects the injections can cause. The GP says her wife “suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae [a burning or prickling sensation], and numb hands and feet… .” Phelps adds that she continues to observe those “devastating effects a year and a half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation.”
As for Phelps, she says she was “diagnosed with a vaccine injury from [her] second dose of Pfizer vaccine in July 2021, with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues.” She adds that in her case “the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations.” Phelps also highlights the fact that despite specialists confirming the injection-related nature of her diagnosis, as well as that of her wife’s, her country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has “never followed up” on their reports.
Not only has the TGA not followed up on Phelps’ wife’s injection-induced symptoms, as well as her own, but she echoes Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo (amongst many other medical professionals) in noting that her claims are being censored. (Listen to Ladapo speak on the censorship issue himself via the post embedded immediately above.)
“Vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about,” Phelps adds in her submission to parliament. “Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunization, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermind the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration.”
Phelps also claims that “In trying to convince people in positions of influence to pay attention to the risks of Long COVID and reinfection for people with vaccine injury, [she has] personally been met with obstruction and resistance to openly discuss [the] issue.” The physician adds “There has been a delay in recognition of vaccine injury, partly because of under-reporting, concerns about vaccine hesitancy in the context of managing a global pandemic, and needing to find the balance between risks and benefits on a population level.”
The general practitioner notes that the Paul Erlich Institute (PEI), Germany’s pharmacovigilance body, has undertaken ongoing surveys of vaccine recipients and “[has] found that the incidence of serious reactions occurs in 0.3 [people] per 1000 shots (not people).” Phelps adds that “[since] the majority of Australian adults have now had at least one booster, this suggests that the incidence of serious adverse reactions per vaccinated person could be more than 1-in-1,000.” She even points out that “PEI admits that under-reporting is a problem, and observers suggest that an order of magnitude of under-reporting is not unreasonable to consider… .” In a parenthetical, Phelps says “most estimates put underreporting at much worse than this.” (Indeed, as you can see in the excerpt immediately above, a 2011 study performed by researchers at Harvard found that, in the U.S., less than 1% of adverse events related to vaccines are reported to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.)
Phelps discusses many of the potential adverse events caused by the COVID injections, although specifically tackles some of the falsehoods surrounding myocarditis and pericarditis in particular.
“Less generally recognized [than the clots associated with the AstraZeneca injection] are the reported adverse reactions after mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna beyond myocarditis and pericarditis,” Phelps says. “Even then [however], there has been a misconception that myocarditis is ‘mild,’ ‘transient’ and ‘mostly in young males,’ when there are many cases where myocarditis is manifestly not mild, not transient and not confined to the young male demographic.”
Indeed, there is an overwhelming amount of data in the medical literature (as well as VAERS) evincing the fact that myo/pericarditis caused by the COVID injections is anything but rare. Not only is it easy to observe in the ever-growing body of studies on the matter—read eleven of them for yourself via the post embedded immediately above—but there is at least one report of COVID injection-induced myocarditis occurring on the same night in the same hospital in two different, young, healthy doctors; a statistical impossibility if the adverse event was as rare as it is purported to be.
“The burden of proof seems to have been placed on the vaccine injured rather than the neutral scientific position of placing suspicion on the vaccine in the absence of any other cause and the temporal correlation with the administration of the vaccine,” Phelps adds.
Phelps even goes as far as to say that the dreadful “Long COVID” she harps on about in her submission—which she admits is affecting an unknown number of Australians and having an unknown impact—may be due, at least in some part, to COVID injection injuries.
“It is possible that there is at least some shared pathophysiology between vaccine injury and Long COVID, possibly due to the effects of spike protein,” Phelps says. She notes that “A group of Greek scientists [have published] a good summary on the ‘spike,’ which points to a possible mechanism of causality.” However, it should be noted that, according to one of her tweets, Phelps believes that COVID injection injuries cannot account for 100% of Long COVID. (Whatever that is.)
As a side note, the summary by Greek Scientists published in Trends in Molecular Medicine cites several important claims about the COVID injections, including the following points (listed here verbatim):
- Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) probably have a broad distribution in human tissues/organs; they may also (along with the packaged mRNA) exert a proinflammatory action.
- COVID-19 mRNA vaccines encode a transmembrane SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein; however, shedding of the antigen and/or related peptide fragments into the circulation may occur.
- Binding of circulating S protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (that is critical for the renin–angiotensin system balance) or to other targets, along with the possibility of molecular mimicry with human proteins, may contribute to the vaccination-related AEs.
Interestingly, despite her own serious injury, her wife’s severe injury, and her acknowledgement of not only all the other people experiencing severe adverse events, but also the—likely massive—underreporting factor, Phelps does not call for a halt to the mRNA COVID injections, nor any other versions of the supposed “vaccines.” On the contrary, she uses the claims from her submission to call for vaccines with increased “safety” to be deployed. How Phelps can call for “safer” experimental injections while simultaneously letting the ones that she admits cause serious damage to the population remain on the market seems beyond ludicrous, however. And evinces the kind of mind prison in which the so-called “Branch Covidians” remain. Even when their own church—intentionally—tries to destroy them.
In the video immediately below, YouTube channel Australians vs. The Agenda offers a tongue-in-cheek “how it started, how it’s going” look at Phelps’ ardent support of pointless COVID mandates juxtaposed with the announcement of her and her wife’s injuries. This is included not to ridicule Phelps, but to point out that it’s hard to get people to stop selling the grand COVID lie even after it’s harmed them personally.
Feature image: Australians vs. The Agenda
Related News
