er-doc-goes-over-source-pfizer-documents-in-detail-shows-irrefutable-evidence-the-covid-injections-are-exceptionally-dangerous-including-1223-reports-of-death-after-administration

ER Doc Goes Over Source Pfizer Documents In Detail, Shows ‘Irrefutable Evidence’ the COVID Injections Are Exceptionally Dangerous, Including 1,223 Reports of Death After Administration


TOP LINE

In this interview (from summer of 2021) ER physician Dr. Daniel Nagase goes over the “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports” released by Pfizer, which shows the pharma giant’s COVID “vaccines” were associated with 42,086 adverse events, including 1,223 deaths, in just a three-month timespan. Nagase also highlights the fact that the Pfizer document evinces serious adverse events amongst pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, and says that, overall, the bevy of reports provides “irrefutable evidence” that the COVID injections need to be pulled from the market immediately.


Note: In this post the Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” is simply referred to as the Pfizer “vaccine.”

ER physician Dr. Daniel Nagase has been a—very—outspoken critic of the governmental responses to the COVID-19 “pandemic,” noting in particular the usefulness of Ivermectin as a drug for early treatment, as well as the enormous dangers of the COVID “vaccines.” In the below interview with Melanie Risdon of the Western Standard, Nagase goes over source Pfizer documents that he says show “irrefutable evidence” the experimental injections should be pulled from the market immediately, including 1,223 reports of death in a three-month timespan.

In the above interview—from the summer of 2021—Nagase goes over the “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports” for Pfizer’s EUA “vaccine” (BNT162B2), which covered reports of adverse events between when Pfizer’s injections were initially released through February 28, 2021. The reports—which were only made available to the public after the nonprofit Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) sued the FDA to have them released—were based on an undisclosed number of Pfizer “vaccines” shipped worldwide. However, the absolute number of adverse-event cases in the report was 42,086. (And, again all these reports were only submitted during the first three months Pfizer’s novel injections were made available. And this report is only for Pfizer, not Moderna, AstraZeneca, etc.)

“Thirty-one percent of people [out of the 42,086 case reports] have either died or had a long-term or permanent side effect from getting this injection,” Nagase says in the interview. “This should be front-page news.”

Link to Pfizer / FDA document

Indeed, when one adds up the “Recovered with sequelae” cases (520), the “Not recovered at the time of report” cases (11,361), and the number of “fatal cases” and divides by the total number of reported adverse events, that is 31%.

Nagase goes on to discuss the cases of adverse events in breastfeeding mothers and pregnant women, noting that “27% of pregnant women who [experienced an adverse event after receiving] this injection had a serious event,” including “miscarriages and stillbirths.” As shown in the Pfizer document excerpt immediately below, 274 “pregnancy cases” were reported during this three-month post-authorization period for Pfizer, including “spontaneous abortion,” “premature birth with neonatal death,” and “spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death.”

Link to Pfizer / FDA document

Just as important were 133 reported “breast feeding baby cases.” Pfizer noted that 116 of the cases were due to “reported exposure to vaccine during breastfeeding,” clearly stating the babies were exposed to Pfizer’s experimental injection “via breast milk.” Six “breast feeding mother” cases were also reported, including one serious case that “occurred in [the] mother during breast feeding.”

These instances of “vaccine exposure” (or what some may call “vaccine shedding…”) also appear in VAERS, the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Approximately a dozen reports of women experiencing “blue,” “green,” “blue-green,” or even “neon green” breast milk after receiving either Pfizer’s injection or Moderna’s injection had been reported by September, 2022. (Read more about that via the post embedded immediately below.) Likewise, a research letter published in JAMA Pediatrics on September 26, 2022 described a cohort study that demonstrated there are indeed trace amounts of Pfizer’s COVID-19 “vaccine” (a.k.a. BNT162b2) as well as Moderna’s COVID-19 “vaccine” (a.k.a. mRNA-1273) in breast milk of lactating mothers post “vaccination.” The trace amounts of the COVID-19 mRNA “vaccines” were found in 45% of lactating mothers (5 out of 11 of the breastfeeding mothers in the cohort study).

Furthermore, Nagase notes that “children were not supposed to receive this [Pfizer] injection” during this three-month post-authorization period, but still did “inadvertently.” Amongst the children who shouldn’t have received the injection during this period, but still did, there were 46 cases in children under the age of 16 and 34 cases in children under the age of 12. Nagase specifically notes that amongst those cases, there were 24 “serious” cases—including 13 in which the child “did not get better.” The emergency room physician goes on to ask rhetorically: “How is it possible that Health Canada approved this for use in children under the age of 12 with this kind of data?”

“This is irrefutable evidence from Pfizer themselves that their injection is dangerous,” Nagase says. “[T]he risks of injecting mRNA material into people, the risks of injecting RNA material into a parent who has a developing fetus within them… [and] the theoretical risks of injecting RNA material into children is extremely high.”

Link to Pfizer / FDA document

“Based on what’s been released by Pfizer so far—[i.e.] the information that’s [been] known by governments since April 30th, 2021—this product should’ve been taken off the market and never been brought back again,” Nagase adds, stating his position unequivocally. “The evidence of danger in just the first three months of this [Pfizer injection] being out there is extreme.”

Not only is this evidence alone irrefutable, but it’s important to note that Pfizer itself claims in this post-authorization document that “the magnitude of [adverse event] underreporting is unknown.” Meaning the rates of these adverse events could be far, far higher than it may seem based on these numbers alone. The pharma giant also notes in the document that in this three-month period it had received “large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports” for its product; so many, in fact, that the corporation needed to hire on extra staff to process all of the cases.

Link to Pfizer / FDA document

This report, of course, is just the very tip of the iceberg when it comes to adverse events associated with the wildly dangerous COVID injections. Blood clotting, myocarditis and pericarditis, neurological issues, and skin issues, amongst many other problems, have been reported extensively in both the peer-reviewed medical literature and VAERS. Not to mention other adverse-event reporting systems from around the world, such as the Yellow Card system in the UK.


Feature image: U.S. Secretary of Defense

(Visited 454 times, 1 visits today)

Accessibility Toolbar