WHO Whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger Cut Off at Health Freedom Conference for Discussing Graphene Oxide in the COVID ‘Vaccines,’ Told by Dr. Ryan Cole that Claim’s a ‘Red Herring’


A new video clip shows World Health Organization whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger being cut off at a recent “health freedom” conference in Stockholm, Sweden after bringing up the potential presence of graphene oxide in the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Amongst those who tried to minimize Stuckelberger’s thoughts on the issue was pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, who said “there are no nanochips and… absolutely no graphene oxide” in all the “vaccine” vials he’s tested. Cole also referred to Stuckelberger’s claims as a “red herring.”

While the “health freedom movement” that has arisen in response to the COVD-19 countermeasures agrees universally on key issues—particularly the complete elimination of all mandates for the wildly dangerous and utterly ineffective COVID-19 “vaccines”—other issues can still be quite contentious. A case in point came recently when World Health Organization (WHO) whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger brought up the idea of graphene oxide in the COVID injections at a conference in Sweden. Apparently, according to witness testimony and a brief video, Stuckelberger was cut off from discussing such an idea, including by pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole who dismissed the idea as a “red herring.”

In the video immediately above, captured by an audience member at the “Pandemic Strategies Lessons and Consequences” conference in Stockholm, Sweden, which took place beginning January 21 of this year and lasted for two days, we watch as pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole—a prominent critic of the COVID-19 injections—tells the attending audience that “there are no nanochips and… absolutely no graphene oxide in the hundreds of vials [of COVID vaccine] we’ve looked at.”

Cole, it seems, was responding to comments Stuckelberger made regarding the presence of graphene oxide—the oxidized form of graphene (which itself is a one-atom-thick layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice) often proposed for use in lipid nanoparticle technology—in the COVID “vaccine” vials. Midway through his comments, Stuckelberger walks over to Cole and they begin to exchange words about the topic. “You’re not an expert of nanoparticles and of oxide graphene,” Stuckelberger says in response to Cole’s statement of his experience behind a microscope. “You cannot be an expert in nanoparticles,” the WHO whistleblower adds.

In another video taken by another audience member Stuckelberger posted to her Telegram page we see Dr. Cole request a microphone from the event’s organizers, take center stage, and make his “quick comment” about there being no graphene oxide or nanochips in the COVID injections. The clip also features the man yelling from the audience in support of Stuckelberger from the video above, Dr. Glenn Dormer. Dormer, who bellows out “I don’t agree!” in response to Cole’s claims regarding the nanochips, etc., describes what happened at the conference from his point of view in the interview immediately below with “Dr. Jane Ruby.” (Ruby describes herself as a “medical professional” and “pharmaceutical drug development expert.”)

“She showed everything that’s coming!” Dormer, a general practitioner working in Sweden, tells Ruby in his interview. He claims the reason Stuckelberger was not allowed to speak openly about the possibility of nanotechnology and graphene oxide in the COVID injections is because of the fact that she “was revealing too much of the WHO plan for us.”

“I found myself on my feet and I said ‘This woman is risking her life to tell more truth than we’ve seen in the whole two days of this conference,” Dormer tells Ruby, describing the reason he felt the urge to shout at Cole when the pathologist attempted to discredit Stuckelberger’s claims on the spot. He says that after Stuckelberger brought up the graphene oxide, she was “verbally being forced to sit down” by Cole, as well as virologist and former member of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche. (Vanden Bossche himself has been an outspoken critic of the COVID injections, although he’s focused on the idea of mass vaccination leading to the creation of more deadly “variants” of the disease.)

Responding to the audience-member video released online, Ruby took to Twitter and wrote “Ryan Cole Gets Outed By European Scientists After His Attempt To Deny Lipid Nanoparticles and Graphene Oxide FAILS!” Ruby added “looks like [the] goal was to try & debunk But Dr. Astrid confronted him on stage while scientists called him out.”

Cole responded to Ruby’s tweet saying “You are screwed up or drunk. I call out the dangerous lipid nano particles all the time. What everyone pretends to be graphene and nano bots are cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals.” He added, however, that “Yes there are metal contaminants.”

Stuckelberger herself also responded to Ruby’s tweet, saying “The organizers cut off my time + my microphone as i questioned the ONLY narrative mRNA/Spike that systematically discards the important findings of engineers and chemists… .” Stuckelberger added criminology science is needed… .”

As for where the debate stands now, it seems there are still two schools of thinking on the matter; one consisting of people like Cole, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Richard Urso, as well as many doctors associated with America’s Frontline Doctors, who believe there is no graphene oxide (or nanochips) in the COVID injections and one consisting of people like Stuckelberger, med-legal advisor Karen Kingston, microbiologist Robert O. Young, and even Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee who believe those things are indeed present.

In the near future, Ruby says she is going to have Stuckelberger on her show to make clear exactly what happened at the Stockholm conference.

Feature image: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff / PackBMEengineer / Stannered

(Visited 1,855 times, 1 visits today)

Accessibility Toolbar