heres-how-authorities-could-generate-a-marburg-pandemic-as-a-way-to-reinstate-and-bolster-tyrannical-control-measures-opinion

Here’s How Authorities Could Generate a Marburg ‘Pandemic’ as a Way to Reinstate and Bolster Tyrannical Control Measures [Opinion]


TOPLINE

Here is an overview of how tyrannical authorities such as the WHO, federal governments across the West, the Bank of International Settlements, et al. could manufacture a “Marburg pandemic” in 2023. WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus has already announced a supposed outbreak of the disease in Africa, and at least one FEMA whistleblower claims the wheels are already in motion to declare some kind of new “plandemic” this year.


On February 15 of this year WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus announced to the world an outbreak of Marburg virus in the Central African country of Equatorial New Guinea. Ghebreyesus, who is, in effect, a mouthpiece for the WHO’s largest funders, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI, noted there was an “outbreak” in two districts near the country’s borders with Cameroon and Gabon, which resulted in nine deaths “in people with symptoms consistent with Marburg.”

In his briefing, Ghebreyesus went on to note that one of the deceased tested positive for the virus, but said “Marburg could not be confirmed [in the other eight cases] because samples could not be obtained.” Although the virus was suspected as all nine of the cases were “most likely part of the same transmission chain.”

While the fearmongering over Marburg has since largely dissipated (at least on social media platforms), it’s easy to imagine how the “rare but severe hemorrhagic fever” could be used to whip up mass psychosis once again, just as COVID-19 (whatever that is) was used in 2020, and onward. In regard to how that could be executed, there are a few avenues for demented and tyrannical authorities—such as the WHO, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the HHS’ counterparts in European and South American countries—to explore.

Marburg—a filovirus first recognized in 1967 when outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred simultaneously in laboratories in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany, and in Serbia—for example, has a staggering fatality rate according to “official” sources, with the CDC pegging the case-fatality rate for the virus at somewhere between 23-90%. Compare that to the infection-fatality ratio of SARS-CoV-2, which, worldwide, is approximately .15%.

While it was easy enough for authorities to misconstrue regular influenza deaths (or most any other deaths for that matter) as deaths “with” COVID-19, on its face it would appear authorities would have a much more difficult time faking a Marburg pandemic, as an overwhelming portion of those “infected” would need to die in order for Marburg to serve as a reasonable culprit. However, what authoritarian globalists (masterminded by the likes of the Bank of International Settlements, the WHO, the U.S. Department of Defense, etc.) could do is re-label COVID-19 “vaccine” deaths as Marburg deaths.

As the post embedded immediately above explores, the COVID-19 “vaccines”—which are, in fact, “prototype countermeasures” manufactured by relatively nameless, faceless DOD-funded pharma companies—are causing enormous amounts of excess death wherever they’ve been deployed. In a brief report published by the not-for-profit CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest, for example, Canadian physics professor and scientist Denis Rancourt and his colleagues show the “booster” campaign in Australia led to a massive swell in all-cause mortality. As shown in the graph immediately below, booster uptake between mid-January to mid-February 2022 coincided perfectly with a mortality peak.

Image: Denis G. Rancourt et al. / CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest

Likewise, all-cause mortality out of Germany evinces an undeniable relationship between the rollout of the COVID injections and excess all-cause mortality. In the video immediately below German data analyst Tom Lausen, speaking in front of an audience at the country’s federal parliament, offers his analysis of mortality data collected from the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (or KBV). As his graphs show—starkly—there were staggering increases in deaths attributed to unknown causes, deaths occurring 24 hours after symptom onset, and “sudden deaths,” all perfectly in sync with the rollout of the COVID injections in the country.

There is also, of course, the same kind of evidence coming out of the U.K., the U.S., and any other country moronic and fearful enough to launch an unsafe, experimental biologic on its population. Steve Kirsch adds to the pile of evidence all-cause mortality data from Medicare’s database, and Edward Dowd has shown the COVID injections to be the “smoking gun” responsible for a sudden rise in deaths amongst working-age Americans (otherwise healthy and with good-paying jobs) in 2021.

As for how these excess deaths could be labeled as “Marburg deaths,” it’s not hard to guess how the magic trick could be performed. We’ve already seen the introduction of “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS) to cover for the deaths due to the COVID injections, and the same has been done for infant deaths and the regular “vaccination” schedule with “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.” Pivoting from SADS to “Marburg outbreak!” could be pulled off with the same con used for COVID: mass testing.

Link to CDC page

The CDC notes on its website that Marburg—which reportedly spreads person to person, through blood or bodily fluids—can be diagnosed with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which is the same type of test that was used, to a large extent, to generate fear over supposed SARS-CoV-2 infections. Authorities like the WHO and CDC wouldn’t even need to isolate whatever new, supposed Marburg virus would be touted, as they didn’t need to isolate SARS-CoV-2 for that viral PCR test.

Indeed, it is unequivocal that the CDC did not isolate SARS-CoV-2 for the PCR test that supposedly detected for the “novel” virus. As the excerpt from the test’s instructional (immediately below) notes, “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted… .” (This instructional was made effective in July 2021, so there’s no sense in the idea the CDC didn’t have time to isolate the virus.)

Link to CDC instructional document

Furthermore, as Ghebreyesus already did on February 15, authorities can assume people may be positive for the virus if they’re symptomatic and have been exposed to a known “transmission chain.” In regard to COVID-19, the CDC even says a negative test doesn’t mean a person doesn’t have the disease. If they’re still symptomatic, the CDC says they “may” have COVID-19. Note the CDC says, however, that “You cannot tell the difference between flu and COVID-19 by symptoms alone because some of the symptoms are the same.”

Link to CDC page

Although it’d be hard to mistake Marburg’s eventual symptoms for a common disease like the flu, its “sudden” onsent symptoms “marked by fever, chills, headache, and myalgia” wouldn’t be. Again, it would be easy to imagine how authorities could force a person to quarantine at home—or be removed to a FEMA camp—by simply mistaking normal influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms for Marburg symptoms. In between their presumptive infection and the resolution of their symptoms, in the normal course of the disease, they could be counted as an official “case.” If they were sent to a hospital or FEMA camp with anybody who was actually infected with Marburg—or a similar virus or even some kind of biological weapon—they could become infected there.

A potential Marburg “pandemic” could take yet another page out of the COVID playbook to make the global infection seem as terrible as possible: the use of harmful “medications,” such as remdesivir.

As with COVID, the WHO is considering the use of remdesivir, a wildly dangerous and ineffective antiviral that was launched under an emergency use authorization (EUA), for a Marburg “treatment.” MARVAC, “a consortium representing leaders in the field of vaccine research and development aiming to facilitate a rapid response to this [Marburg] infectious disease threat” put out a report in July 2022 noting that approval for remdesivir as a treatment for Marburg was being pursued due to its “~80% efficacy” in nonhuman primates.

Link to MARVAC report

Of course, it’s lunacy to use remdesivir as a “treatment” for Marburg, SARS-CoV-2, or any other virus, as it is deadly. The study supposedly used to demonstrate remdesivir’s efficacy in treating Ebola—the study first cited to support the use of the drug in treating COVID-19—showed that it resulted in the most deaths out of any drug used in its trial.

“A total of 681 patients were enrolled from November 20, 2021, to August 9, 2019, at which time the data and safety monitoring board recommended that patients be assigned only to the Mab114 and REGN-EB3 groups [as opposed to remdesivir] for the remainder of the trial,” Mulangu et al. wrote in their study published in The New England Journal of Medicine on December 12, 2019. The authors compared remdesivir against other treatment options for Ebola infections, but discontinued remdesivir after finding it had the highest mortality rate. The WHO even originally recommended “against the use of remdesivir” in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. (It has since updated its guidelines to allow for the use of remdesivir, citing zero scientific evidence for its change in policy.)

Link to WHO page

By the same token, the WHO is also reviewing several “vaccine” candidates for Marburg, which could itself cause infections that would, in turn, be misconstrued as cases of the disease. In the case of the monkeypox (or “mpox”) “vaccine,” for example, the injection itself causes the kinds of symptoms associated with the disease—including characteristic pox on the skin. In the case of the Marburg vaccines, it’s not clear from (free) available research what their exact side effects are, but it’s clear they do cause adverse effects. A 2021 study published in Vaccine, for example, had four “adverse effects requiring vaccine discontinuation” among 128 participants. Meaning more than 3% of vaccine recipients experienced an adverse effect.

Incredibly, there is also evidence that the COVID injections encode for antigenic glycoproteins from both Marburg and Ebola. I.e. just as the novel COVID injections contain the mRNA for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, they also contain the mRNA for harmful proteins from Marburg and Ebola.

As naturopath Dr. Ariyana Love notes in the interview with Stew Peters immediately above, the patent for two filovirus vaccines was used, per a patent citation (immediately below), for Johnson and Johnson’s COVID injection. Patent US2014001727A1 is specifically cited by Johnson and Johnson, which is the patent for “recombinant adenovirus vector” vaccines “encoding filovirus antigens.”

“[W]hat they are doing is they are infecting people,” Love tells Peters. “They are transfecting people’s cells so that their own cells will continuously reproduce this pathogen, this deadly pathogen, and make them contagious to others.”

Link to patent US20140017278A1

Along with those speculative pieces of evidence that a Marburg “pandemic” could be faked, just as the COVID “pandemic” was (arguably), a FEMA whistleblower has also come forward and said, in January of this year, that the “next plandemic” would occur within a three-to-six-month timeframe. Meaning June of this year at the latest. The whistleblower also said that Marburg is, apparently, one of the options on the table as a headlining disease.

There is “another pandemic [that] is coming in the next three to six months,” the whistleblower told Australian interviewer Maria Zeee in January. He referred to the “plandemic” as “another scare… just like COVID” and said that it would take the guise of “Ebola, Marburg, another coronavirus or whatever it is going to be… .”

Finally, it’s important to note that the media, federal governments in countries across the West, scientific journals, and just about anybody else working in any capacity related to viruses or epidemiology or pandemics is happy to shout from the rooftops about so-called “gain-of-function” (GOF) research, which ostensibly makes viruses either more deadly, more lethal, or both. However, it seems to be that there’s a good case to be made for that whole narrative simply being a way of priming people to fear juiced-up, human-altered viruses.

In the post embedded immediately below, for example, pharma industry veteran Sasha Latypova outlines the reasons she believes that GOF is simply a “fairytale” that fails to ring true because it’s nonsensical on its face. She notes specifically that the idea of a virus becoming both more lethal and more transmissible is completely wrongheaded, as when a virus becomes more deadly, it necessarily becomes less transmissible. And vice versa. (Viruses also want their hosts to stay alive so they can move on to more hosts.) Latypova adds that when one looks closely at GOF studies, such as the well-publicized one from Boston University from October of 2022, no “scary, scary viruses” (Latypova’s words) are ever actually produced.

With all of this evidence in mind, if the globalist “elites” do indeed decide that it’s time for a “Marburg pandemic,” it’s important to remember that the cabal’s most effective tool is fear. But as long as we’re aware of the narrative tools they’ll use to scare free people in the West (e.g. the PCR testing, the COVID-injection excess deaths, the GOF “fairytale”), at least we’ll be able to keep our wits about us. And, hopefully, avoid the FEMA camps.


Feature image: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

(Visited 272 times, 1 visits today)

Accessibility Toolbar