phd-physicist-says-all-cause-mortality-data-show-covid-was-not-a-viral-respiratory-disease-pandemic-and-that-the-vaccines-are-killing-millions-of-people

PhD Physicist Says All-Cause Mortality Data Show COVID ‘Was Not a Viral Respiratory Disease Pandemic’ and that the ‘Vaccines’ Are Killing Millions of People


TOPLINE

In this interview with Matthew Ehret, scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor Dr. Denis Rancourt describes the findings of his research pertaining to COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. Rancourt, who has written over 100 peer-reviewed journal articles in technical areas of science and technology, says that, looking at the all-cause mortality numbers alone, he “can prove [COVID-19] was not a viral respiratory disease pandemic… .” Rancourt also says the COVID “vaccines” are killing enormous numbers of people, including at least 3.7 million people in India.


In this interview with Matthew Ehret, a journalist and senior fellow at the American University in Moscow, Denis Rancourt, a scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor, describes the findings of his research pertaining to COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. Rancourt, who has written over 100 peer-reviewed journal articles in technical areas of science and technology has focused his research largely on all-cause mortality, and says that, looking at those numbers alone, he “can prove this was not a viral respiratory disease pandemic… .”

In this interview with Matthew Ehret, scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor Dr. Denis Rancourt describes the findings of his research pertaining to COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. Rancourt, who has written over 100 peer-reviewed journal articles in technical areas of science and technology, says that, looking at the all-cause mortality numbers alone, he “can prove [COVID-19] was not a viral respiratory disease pandemic… .” Rancourt also says the COVID “vaccines” are killing enormous numbers of people, including at least 3.7 million people in India.

“I’m looking at all-cause mortality. There’s no fudging. We’re counting deaths…” Rancourt tells Ehret regarding the whole “died with” COVID or “died of” COVID issue. “I refuse to look at that. Because that’s garbage,” the physicist says. “That’s… garbage in, garbage out. You cannot talk about COVID deaths, because the diagnosis of death when you’re calling it a COVID death is completely biased and unreliable. So I like to cut through and say, ‘Look, I’m only going to deal with actual mortality.”

“On that basis,” Rancourt says, he “can prove this was not a viral respiratory disease pandemic… Period.”

In regard to whether or not SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin or lab-made origin, Rancourt says the following:

“The thing that links the two theories is they’re both of the opinion that a novel pathogen came onto the planet and caused havoc and death. And what we have proven is that there was no such thing. There was no viral respiratory disease pandemic. All of the anomalies in all-cause mortality are inconsistent with this complete hypothesis that it was a contagious, viral respiratory disease. It disproves it completely. And is consistent with what we know of the measures that were being applied. We know that ventilators were killing people… We know all these things.”

As for what’s been the cause of excess deaths during the “COVID period,” Rancourt points to deadly hospital protocols, as well as the enormously dangerous and deadly COVID-19 injections. See the mounting evidence showing the COVID injections are the cause of enormous excess death via the post embedded immediately below.

“There… were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced and the all-cause mortality surged in a rapid peak that lasted only a month or two, and this happened synchronously everywhere where there was a hot spot, it happened at the same time. Where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people,” Rancourt tells Ehret. The physicist notes that “One of the main things [killing patients] was putting people on ventilators… .”

Rancourt notes that “in Northern Italy, where they had a huge hot spot, they actually bragged about having developed the ability to put… two people per ventilator… And they bragged about this. They said they were going to beat COVID. So they were putting everyone on ventilators, which are extremely deadly and increase the chance of getting a bacterial infection in the respiratory tract and so on.”

Countless other doctors and medical professionals, such as former Pfizer VP Michael Yeadon, Dr. Daniel Nagase, and Dr. Peterson Pierre, have attested to the deadly overuse of ventilators for COVID patients. Hear more about that via the post embedded immediately below.

In places like Italy, Paris, London, New York, and the province of Quebec, Rancourt says, there were “these huge spikes in mortality that did not spread, [and] that were completely synchronous and coincident with the announcement of the pandemic where they… got the go-ahead to go ahead and apply these protocols and do what they did in hospitals.”

“The big hospitals that followed this kind of militaristic new approach were killing fields basically,” Rancourt notes. “And… you cannot explain those synchronous peaks around the world with the usual epidemiological theory of [the] spread of a respiratory disease. There is no way. Because you would need exactly the same kind of society, happening in the same way, seeding all these places at the same time… it’s impossible.”

“All-cause mortality, counting deaths, is the hardest, most robust data you can have. You can’t fudge it… [M]ost countries do not fake their death numbers. They’re real numbers. And if you look at that as a function of time by jurisdiction, by age, and by sex, you can prove unambiguously, scientifically that there was no pandemic,” Rancourt notes. He adds that “the places where there were deaths, and all the deaths, were the result of the assault against people.”

Rancourt notes the assaults were “many-pronged” and that “they killed many different people, and the people who mostly died are the people who were most vulnerable and most fragile.”

“So the elderly people, the people whose lives had been completely changed and so on, they’re the people who died,” Rancourt says. He adds: “[T]hen when they brought in the vaccine, they are not recognizing, or they initially did not recognize, it actually does cause death. It is a dangerous toxic substance that has a definite risk associated with it and you are going to kill approximately 1% of the most frail and elderly people when you inject them with this thing; per injection.”

Link to OpenVAERS

“[W]e know from the VAERS data that deaths occur immediately after the vaccine. When you die, you die within the first few days, or, within the first few months, there’s then an exponential decay of deaths with time from the time that you were injected at,” Rancourt tells Ehret. (See a graph of what Rancourt is discussing immediately above.)

The physicist highlights India as one country-level example of the COVID-19 injections killing a massive number of people. Rancourt notes:

“In India, the rollout of the vaccine killed 3.7 million people. There were no deaths until they rolled out the vaccine, then the government said we need to especially vaccinate the most elderly and those who have comorbidity conditions. And they actually had a list of 12 comorbidity conditions they wanted you to absolutely get vaccinated [for], if you were already dying from these things… so they assaulted these individuals in what they call the vaccine festival… and they… killed 3.7 million people in India. And you can really see the peak.”

Rancourt further notes that in India, all of the provinces “saw this same incredible surge of deaths… coincident with the vaccine rollout. And they rolled out the vaccine everywhere in India at about the same time…” He adds, “none of the provinces escaped it. So they all saw it.” (Link to one of Rancourt’s papers on India here.)

Furthermore, Rancourt says that the mortality trend in India is “a flat line until you get there [to the injection rollout], nothing, no COVID, nothing, and then it surges like we’ve never seen on the planet and it’s coincident with the vaccine rollout… .”

Researchers studying COVID deaths in India, Rancourt says, “actually adjust[ed] the virulence of their so-called Delta variant in order to get the right mortality. In other words, they [did] not ab initio determine the virulence of the so-called Delta variant, they adjust[ed] it in a model to get the right answer. This is the kind of thing that they do.”

As for the true deadliness of the wildly ineffective COVID-19 injections, Rancourt notes “the risk of dying per injection rises exponentially with the age of the person, and that risk doubles every five years of age of the person.”

Rancourt adds: “So what that means is when you’re up in the 80-plus, 85-plus [age range], you’re at one or more percent risk per injection of dying. So it’s the exact opposite of what the governments have been telling us; to go and vaccinate the elderly because they most need protection. In fact, they are most at risk of dying from the injection and you are directly assaulting them with a toxic substance.”

Rancourt also notes that “extremely vulnerable” people were killed—particularly in the U.S.—by way of isolating them and destroying their habits and social connections.

The “U.S. has huge pools of extremely vulnerable people… There are 13 million people in the United States that are certified disabled by mental illness. And that are on heavy medication—that have to be taken care of and so on. If you isolate them, if you destroy their habits and their lives and their connection to the world, you will kill them in short order…” Rancourt tells Ehret. (Read more about how governors isolated the elderly via the post embedded immediately above.)

The physicist goes on to say supposed COVID-19 deaths were “really about poverty, not a viral respiratory disease, because it doesn’t correlate to age and the median age or the average age in a state in the United States, for example.” Rancourt adds, “So here’s this high mortality in the U.S. that is especially in the Southern states where there’s a lot of poverty and there’s a lot of fragile people who already take a lot of antibiotics compared to people in other states. And they also cut the antibiotic prescriptions in half. So they were not treating bacterial pneumonia… so part of the assault was just refusing to treat people, in effect.”


Feature image: Maryland GovPics

(Visited 1,219 times, 1 visits today)

Accessibility Toolbar